The Voice of China: A Phenomenal Entertainment Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“6.8%”，《中国好声音》第三季在2014年10月7日决赛夜的这个最高收视点记录，将当晚除去广告的平均收视率拉升为6.4%。这个收视率不仅是第三季之最，也成为前三季之最。它将《好声音》的现象级拉到了一个新的峰值。《好声音》是由上海灿星文化传播有限公司制作、由浙江卫视播出的多季音乐选秀节目。这个节目的高收视率是否能够持续？对于这个问题，灿星总裁、《好声音》总导演金磊和他的老板——星空华文国际传媒有限公司CEO田明都不能给出确切的答案。田明说，最初制作这档节目时，他就知道节目肯定会成功，但能有多么成功，却是个悬念，既使《好声音》成为现象级节目后，这个悬念依然悬而未决。“这一现象能否持续飙升？能持续多久？如果不能持续，灿星该如何应对？”打造出现象级的《好声音》后，田明和金磊以及他们的核心团队就一直在探讨这些问题。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".