MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132496044

The Impact of Demographic Changes on Employment - The Case of the Republic of Croatia

2022· dissertation· hr· W7132496044 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lucija Gašpić

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business · 2022
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCroatianCzechQuarter (Canadian coin)The Republic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suvremeni društveno-ekonomski razvoj dovodi do promjena u strukturi ljudskog kapitala, ali i do afirmacije ljudskog kapitala u ključan čimbenik gospodarskog rasta. Tržište rada predstavlja izuzetno važnu kariku cjelokupnog gospodarstva pojedine zemlje te kretanja na tržištu radne snage mogu imati značajan utjecaj na gospodarstvo u cjelini. Pritom različiti čimbenici utječu na tržište rada, a među njima se ističu i demografske promjene. Naime, demografske promjene su veliki izazov s kojim se suočavaju radnici, umirovljenici, poslodavci i vlade. Kada se razmatra utjecaj demografskih promjena na tržište rada u 21. stoljeću, korisno je kao prvi korak usredotočiti se na dvije specifične promjene: starenje stanovništva i potencijalni pad stanovništva. Ovaj rad analizira utjecaj demografskih promjena na zaposlenost u Republici Hrvatskoj kroz višegodišnje razdoblje čime se dolazi do zaključka da Hrvatska ima vrlo nepovoljne demografske trendove kroz desetljeća, a značajne odrednice razvoja stanovništva Hrvatske ni u posljednje vrijeme ne pokazuju značajniji napredak. Visoke stope nezaposlenosti (pri čemu posebice zabrinjavaju visoke stope nezaposlenosti mladih i dugotrajna nezaposlenost), niska stopa aktivnosti, niska stopa zaposlenosti, visoki troškovi radne snage, niska produktivnost radne snage, rigidne plaće te veliki javni sektor obilježja su hrvatskog tržišta rada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and BusinessSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207