The Hungarian kingdom in the 14th and 15th centuries and the rule of king Mathias Corvinus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tema ovog rada je Ugarsko Kraljevstvo u 14. i 15. stoljeću s naglaskom na jednog od najmoćnijih vladara tog vremena - kralja Matijaša Korvina, u narodu zapamćenog kao pravednog vladara o ĉemu svjedoče brojne predaje. Kako bi se razumio njegov izbor i krunidba kao plemića nižeg staleža za kralja Ugarskog Kraljevstva, u radu su prikazani složeni politički i gospodarski odnosi koji su prethodili Matijaševom izboru i krunidbi - od doba vladavine kraljeva iz dinastije Anžuvinaca (Karla I. Roberta i Ludovika I.), potom Žigmunda Luksemburškog, Alberta II. Habsburškog pa do Vladislava I. Jagelovića, te njihovi pokušaji modernizacije kraljevstva provođenjem upravnih, gospodarskih i vojnih reformi. U radu je prikazana vladavina kralja Matijaša Korvina s naglaskom na aktivnosti i odluke koje su mu omogućile uklanjanje samovlasti magnata i utemeljenje centralistiĉke monarhije, provođenje upravnih, financijskih, sudskih i vojnih reformi, te uspostavljanja obrambene linije radi zaštite južnih granica kraljevstva od napada Osmanlija, kao i ratovi s Češkom i Austrijom, te njegov doprinos razvoju humanizma i renesanse na ugarskom dvoru.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it