MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132502129

基于平台的商业模式创新与服务设计

2017· book· W7132502129 on OpenAlexaff
付文慧, Xiande 赵先德, 简兆权

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2017
Typebook
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Excellence in Mining Innovation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Identification (biology)Product (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

互联网、大数据、大众创新正在推动中国企业转型升级。如何通过创新思维、互联网及其他新兴技术重塑商业模式,并通过流程创新支撑商业模式创新,为客户提供更有价值的服务,是当下企业生存与发展的关键问题。《BR》在此背景下,“网络环境下的服务创新与服务设计”研究团队在国家自然科学基金重大项目的资助下,通过与以中国移动、腾讯、平安银行、*为代表的30余家企业的深入合作,系统研究了基于网络平台企业的发展路径、商业模式创新的关键要素、合作机制及关系治理、流程创新如何支持商业模式创新等问题。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositorySame topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207