Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ovaj seminarski rad govorit će o važnosti prosvjetiteljstva i prosvjetiteljskog rada Alberta Fortisa u Hrvatskoj, način na koji je on proširio i obogatio horizonte stanovnika tadašnje Europe. Govorit će o njegovom životu i što ga je nagnalo da krene u prosvjećivanje u nepoznate krajeve. Govorit će o važnosti knjige "Puta po Dalmaciji" i njezinoj kompoziciji, a posebice će biti naglasak na jednom od njenih najzanimljivijih poglavlja koje govori o običajima jednog posve do tada nepoznatog morlačkog naroda. Najstojat će istaknuti važnost njihove kulture, od duhovne do materijalne, te će nastojati navedenu kulturu povezati s točkama današnjice. Rad će također govoriti o odjecima knjige, o pitanjima i zamjerkama koje su buknule nakon njezinog izdavanja. Što je najvažnije, govorit će o Fortisovom promijenjenom pogledu na svijet nakon boravka među Morlacima i o redu koji je uveo u svijet nepoznat građanima koji su bili sigurni jedino unutar zidina vlastitoga grada. Pokušat će dočarati život izvan zidina koji je tadašnjim stanovnicima Italije i Hrvatske bio nezamisliv, zbog neprestanog i pretjeranog straha od razbojnika.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".