MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132502909

Daily Yoga: Mindfulness with Stretches and Binds on a Mat

2024· other· W7132502909 on OpenAlexaff
Taiyuan 王泰元, 黄夏燕

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2024
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessPerception
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

每日瑜伽的创业历程是一个典型的移动互联网创业故事。每日瑜伽成立于2012年,是一家在线瑜伽服务平台,运营“每日瑜伽”App,主要提供线上瑜伽教学课程服务。与传统的创业模式不同,每日瑜伽选择了先在北美市场建立起自己的业务,然后再回归中国市场,并逐渐形成了线上课程、垂直社区、瑜伽电商和线下教练培训四大业务板块。在十余年的发展中,每日瑜伽的用户数量突破了6000万,覆盖了全球212个国家以及中国400多个城市。 然而,作为深耕瑜伽垂直赛道的企业,每日瑜伽既要接受运动“反人性”特质的挑战,又要面对综合类健身平台的竞争,还可能遭遇社交娱乐平台、线下瑜伽馆以及硬件设备厂商等多种商业企业从不同维度发起的“进攻”。用户留存难、商业变现难……每日瑜伽应该如何破局,才能找到新的收入增长点和商业发展机会?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207