MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132544185

Developing relationships between diffusive uptake rate and chemical properties for VOC sampling

2020· article· en· W7132544185 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Doyun Won, Wenping Yang, Gang Nong

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTenaxBoiling pointDiffusionPolarSampling (signal processing)Thermal desorptionDesorptionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffusive sampling of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on thermal desorption (TD) tubes is a useful technique to determine VOC levels in occupied homes due to its simplicity. Diffusive uptake rate (UR) is critical information for passive sampling. Relationships between UR and chemical properties were determined in a chamber (31 m³) with 52 VOCs. TD tubes tested included Carbopack B (CB), Tenax TA (TX) or Carbograph 5TD (CG5) for 4 to 8-day sampling. The results showed that the UR for TX had a positive relationship with boiling point for both polar and non-polar compounds. Diffusion coefficient (Da) was a better predictor of UR for CB and CG5. Interestingly, the UR of non-polar compounds showed a positive relationship with Da, while the opposite was observed for polar compounds on CB. The relationships determined in this study are expected to be useful in understating the levels of VOCs with no measured UR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureFrench-language works237,207