MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132544995

Midea Group: Founder-CEO Succession in a Chinese Home Appliance Maker

2016· other· W7132544995 on OpenAlexaff
Jean S. K. Lee, Liman Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2016
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcological successionProduct (mathematics)Succession planningWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例讲述了美的集团以及下属最大资产——上市公司美的电器两次董事长之职的交班举措。创始人及董事长何享健将美的电器、美的集团的董事长职位分两次、时隔五年依次交给职业经理人方洪波,这是经过了对他的重重考验和对亲生子女深思熟虑之后的结果。本案例不仅讲述了这一决策过程,还讲述了美的集团在早期就有意识地大批培养职业经理人的举措。接班事宜需要具有较高的前瞻性,这个话题对于中国改革开放后大量涌现的第一批企业家而言尤其重要,具有典型的时代意义。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207