MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132547979

Financijal Reporting of non-profit organizations on the example of a non-profit organization X

2015· dissertation· hr· W7132547979 on OpenAlex
Katja Jović

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJuraj Dobrila University of Pula Digital Repository · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Development and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neprofitne organizacije obuhvaćaju sve udruge, zaklade, ustanove, sindikate i sve ostale pravne osobe čije se djelovanje ne temelji na ostvarenju profita za osnivače istih već u svrhu zadovoljenja potreba društva koje nisu mogle biti ostvarene od strane države ili privatnog sektora. Radi transparentnijeg djelovanja, ovaj sektor svoje djelovanje uređuje sukladno odredbama Zakona o financijskom poslovanju i računovodstvu neprofitnih organizacija (Narodne novine 121/14) te ostalim zakonskim i ostalim pravnim aktima koji se temelje na spomenuti Zakon a koji uređuju pitanja svakog od oblika neprofitnih organizacija. Odredbe se tiču pravilnog osnivanja svakog oblika neprofitnih organizacija, upisa u matične registre i sam Registar neprofitnih organizacija, pravila računovodstvenog praćenja poslovnih podataka, postupka sastavljanja i objave financijskih izvještaja te postupak provođenja nadzora nad radom svake pojedine neprofitne organizacije.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it