Nivel de satisfacción laboral y condiciones laborales en maestros de grado del Centro Educativo Fe y Alegría Nº8.171 de Salta-Capital, año 2.022
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo principal de esta investigación fue conocer la relación entre el nivel de satisfacción laboral docente y las condiciones laborales en 27 maestros de grado del turno mañana y tarde del Centro Educativo Fe y Alegría N° 8.171 durante el segundo cuatrimestre del año 2.022 en Salta Capital, Argentina. El estudio se realizó desde el encuadre de la psicología laboral y organizacional siguiendo la teoría bifactorial de de Frederick Helbertz. Se trata de un estudio de caso donde la información recolectada fue analizada siguiendo el método cualitativo y cuantitativo; de tipo descriptivo y alcance explicativo. Los instrumentos de recolección fueron entrevistas y escala de satisfacción laboral para docentes (ESLA-educación) de Oros y Main (2004). Entre sus resultados se sostiene el nivel de satisfacción laboral es medio en el 67% de los maestros de grado. La relación que guardan las condiciones laborales con la satisfacción laboral se refleja en las cuatro dimensiones de la tarea, socio-organizativa, motivacional y autorrealización. En los maestros hay un predominio de los factores intrínsecos más que extrínsecos de satisfacción laboral. La comunicación, motivación, integración, vocación y sentido de logro reflejan mayor satisfacción, mientras que el tiempo de descanso durante la jornada laboral refleja insatisfacción. The main objective of this research was to determine the relationship between the level of job satisfaction and working conditions among 27 grade teachers of the morning and afternoon shifts of Centro Educativo Fe y Alegría No. 8.171 during the second quarter term of the school year 2022 in Salta Capital, Argentina. The study was carried out considering the principles of work and organisational psychology and following Frederick Helbertz's bifactor theory. It is a case study where the information collected was analysed observing the qualitative and quantitative methods; descriptive and explanatory in scope. The collection instruments were interviews and Oros and Main's (2004) Job Satisfaction Scale for Teachers (ESLA-education). According to the results, the level of job satisfaction was found to be medium in 67% of the grade teachers. The relationship between working conditions and job satisfaction is reflected in the four dimensions of task, socio-organisational, motivational and self-fulfillment. It was also found that there is a predominance of intrinsic rather than extrinsic factors of job satisfaction among the teachers. Communication, motivation, integration, vocation and sense of achievement reflect higher satisfaction, whereas time off during the working day reflects dissatisfaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".