Factors associated with intrafamily abuse of the elderly in a primary care center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introducción: El maltrato del adulto mayor es un problema familiar que en muchos casos no es visible porque ocurre en el círculo familiar y este adulto no tiene la oportunidad de mostrar su inconformidad con personas ajenas a su entorno. Objetivo: Evaluar los factores asociados al maltrato intrafamiliar del adulto mayor en un centro de atención primaria durante el año 2024. Metodología: Se realizará una investigación cuantitativa de diseño transversal analítico en donde se estudiarán 669 adultos mayores a quienes se les evaluará con 2 instrumentos de medición del maltrato intrafamilar: Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination y Elder Abuse Suspicion Index. Previo a la ejecución, cada uno de estos instrumentos serán sometidos a un proceso de validez por juicio de expertos. Como parte del análisis multivariado, se trabajará como variable dependiente al maltrato intrafamiliar. Se realizará modelos de regresión logística donde se calculará los OR con su correspondiente intervalo de confianza en un 95 %.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".