Bibliographic record
Abstract
A group of characters of mixed nationalities is situated in an Italian villa in the last stages of WWII. Each of them is lost on an unknown territory, away from their loved ones and asking themselves many questions in search of their identity after being crippled by the war. Gradually, through storytelling, they let their guards down and find comfort in the presence of others. The author Michael Ondaatje, an immigrant himself, portrays Canadian multiculturalism when he lets the characters discard their national identities and choose to form their own, based on their personalities and relationships with others. Hana, a Canadian nurse, stays behind her troop to take care of a patient that is burned beyond recognition. In him, she sees all the men she was not able to save, including her father and decides to reduce his suffering on his deathbed. The patient is merely known as 'the English Patient' due to his English manner and accent. Although it seems that he has lost his memory, flashbacks that he experiences give us fragments of his life story. Canadian thief Caravaggio blames the English patient for losing his thumbs in war which were part of his identity and wishes to have his revenge. The character that shows real coloniser-colonised relationships is Kip, a Sikh sapper working for the British army dismantling bombs. He is estranged from his Indian family but not completely accepted into British society. He is an 'in-between' character of special interest for Ondaatje, who uses his reactions to further explore major postcolonial themes - those of nationalism and identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".