MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132628135

Who Should Be Responsible for the Dismissal of the Xerox’s “Parachute” CEO in 2000?

Yan Gong, Qiong Zhu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2014
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDismissalWork (physics)Government (linguistics)Executive compensation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

理查德?托曼是施乐历史上第一位也是迄今为止唯一一位空降CEO。在传统复印机市场处于垄断位置的施乐,在向数字化市场转型的过程中遇到各种阻力,于是向托曼发出了邀请。托曼加入后围绕着产品和销售组织实施了一系列适应数字化市场的变革。可是,当变革实施到中途时,当托曼在施乐待了两年半、在CEO的位置上待了13个月后,2000年他却突然遭到解雇。为什么会这样?是托曼做得不好?还是施乐方面的问题?本案例沿着这些问题去追踪当时的事实。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207