MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132631191

The buildings and chamber burial beneath the stone church

2024· article· en· W7132631191 on OpenAlexaff
Mads Dengsø Jessen, Anne Pedersen, Mads Kähler Holst

Bibliographic record

VenueMinistry of Culture Research Portal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavationArchitectureStratigraphySituatedFoot (prosody)Documentation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Situated only around 10m south of the foot of the North Mound, Jelling Church occupies a central position within the monument complex and the enclosure; a position which resembles that of the great halls and main buildings of numerous Viking-Age farmsteads and manors recorded across southern Scandinavia. Excavations in the 1940s and 1970s in the standing church from around AD 1100 have revealed traces of several, successive wooden buildings and a chamber burial that is roughly contemporary with the burial in the North Mound. Yet, despite the immense interest in the first building phase and the chamber burial, the architecture of each phase and the stratigraphy beneath the church have only been briefly presented in earlier publications. Based on a re-evaluation of the original Jelling documentation and, in the light of the current, much improved knowledge of the architecture of the period, it is now possible to suggest alternative interpretations of the wooden buildings beneath the church at Jelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinistry of Culture Research PortalSame topicHistorical and Archaeological StudiesFrench-language works237,207