Influence of Pressure and Temperature on the Quality of Aronia Juice Concentrate by Reverse Osmosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cilj ovog rada je bio koncentrirati sok aronije postupkom reverzne osmoze uz upotrebu membrana Alfa Laval-RO98pHt i istražiti utjecaj procesnih parametara tlaka i temperature na kakvoću soka pri tlakovima od 50 i 55 bara, s primjenomi bez primjene hlađenja. Koncentriranje se provodilo na laboratorijskom uređaju za reverznu osmozu LabUnit M20 s pločama i okvirima,primjenom kompozitnih membrana tipa Alfa Laval-RO98pHt. Uzorci permeata i retentata uzimani su u određenim vremenskim intervalima, svakih 12 minuta. Pokusima se pokazalo da je sok aronije moguće koncentrirati procesom reverzne osmoze do maksimalnog udjela suhe tvari od 25,6 %. Koncentriranjem soka aronije RO ne dolazi do značajnih promjena kemijskog sastava soka. Tijekom koncentriranja soka aronije reverznom osmozom dolazi do zagrijavanja soka aronije, od početnih 10 °C na temperaturu oko 46 °C u procesu bez primjene hlađenja, odnosno na 25 °C u procesu s primjenom hlađenja.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".