MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132644585

I rapporti di Sixty-Eight Publishers con il samizdat cecoslovacco e la concorrenza con le altre case editrici dell’emigrazione

2011· article· it· W7132644585 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. (Alena) Přibáňová, M. (Michal) Přibáň

Bibliographic record

VenueASEP · 2011
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechPublishingIndex (typography)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the authors identify some of the legal and very often ethical problems that Czech publishing houses in exile faced, taking as examples two exile publishing houses, Index and 68Publishers, both of which were founded in autumn 1971, in Cologne by Bedřich Utitz and Adolf Müller and in Toronto by Zdena Salivarová and Josef Škvorecký respectively. The article is based on the mutual correspondence of Utitz, Salivarová, Müller and Škvorecký and on Škvorecký´s correspondence with his Czech friends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEPSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207