MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132647452

Biotectura: campus de jardinería y botánica

2021· article· es· W7132647452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marina Álvarez Díaz

Bibliographic record

Venuee_Buah · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Competition (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biotectura es un campus dedicado al estudio de la jardinería y la botánica. Se trata de una ampliación de las actuales infraestructuras del Vivero Municipal, donde se imparten cursos para trabajar en los departamentos de jardinería del ayuntamiento. Se pretende dotar de unas instalaciones que atraiga un público variado, con un hobbie común, la jardinería. El concepto general gira en torno al cultivo. Predominan las zonas verdes y los espacios abiertos. Se puede considerar un proyecto urbanístico, dejando la construcción en un segundo plano, correspondientes a aquellos servicio que complementen la actividad práctica de cultivo, como aulas, vestuarios y almacenes. El proyecto se compone de dos plantas. En la planta baja se distribuyen todos los servicios de educación, comercio y administración. Todos los espacios estarán conectados y protegidos por una envolvente, la cubierta. En planta primera se transmite una vista de espacio rural, dedicándola en su totalidad al cultivo. Se plantea como un espacio diáfano, donde asomen las copas de los árboles de planta baja y existan perforaciones, que coincidan con los patios inferiores, que delimiten los espacios de cultivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee_BuahSame topicAgriculture and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207