MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132670377

Boronate techniques for clean-up and concentration of the vic-diol-containing tetrodotoxins from shellfish

2020· article· en· W7132670377 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel G. Beach, Elliott S. Kerrin, Pearse McCarron, Jane Kilcoyne, Sabrina D. Giddings, Thor Waaler, Ingunn A. Samdal, Kjersti E. Løvberg, Christopher O. Miles

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Toxins and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusselMarine toxinYield (engineering)Extraction (chemistry)Boric acidMatrix (chemical analysis)Shellfish
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boronates bind reversibly to vic-diols, a common structural feature of algal toxins. This boronate–diol interaction can be exploited for selective toxin clean-up and concentration. Boric acid gel (BAG) solid phase extraction (SPE) was recently shown to eliminate interferences and matrix effects in LC-MS analyses of azaspiracids (AZAs) in mussel extracts. Here, we report a modified approach for cleanup of tetrodotoxin (TTX) and many of its congeners, which also contain vic-diols. The reaction between TTX and boronic acids was first investigated in solution to optimize conditions for TTX binding. Then, TTX-contaminated mussel extracts were applied to BAG SPE columns. TTXs were selectively bound and released from the BAG to yield very clean extracts containing TTX analogues and very little else. Potential interferences in LC-MS analyses, such as arginine and other amino acids, were completely eliminated, making this a promising approach for analytical sample preparation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicMarine Toxins and Detection MethodsFrench-language works237,207