Lignes directrices pour l’adaptation du Code national de l’énergie pour les bâtiments de 2011
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Commission canadienne des codes du bâtiment et de prévention des incendies (CCCBPI) a approuvé le contenu du Code national de l'énergie pour les bâtiments (CNÉB) 2011 dans le cadre de sa réunion d'avril 2011. Pendant l'élaboration du document, certaines administrations ont indiqué qu'elles avaient des directives précises en matière de politique sur l'efficacité énergétique des bâtiments qu'elles devaient aborder. Il a été convenu qu'un document serait élaboré pour orienter la modification du CNÉB 2011 de façon à tenir compte de ces directives. Par conséquent, le présent document a été élaboré par un groupe de travail mixte de la CCCBPI et du Comité consultatif provincial-territorial des politiques sur les codes (CCPTPC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".