La tarea docente de transmitir. Panorama crítico del primer cuarto del siglo XXI ; The teaching work of transmitting. The critical scenery of the first quarter of the 21st Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La tarea docente en el primer cuarto del siglo XXI renueva la crisis sobre el acto de transmisión que parece inherente a dicha labor. El presente trabajo repasa la lógica histórico-cultural que ha puesto en crisis el acto de la transmisión con posterioridad a la Modernidad para indicar que lo que esta crisis exige es la resignificación de los actores de toda relación educativa. Se pretende demostrar que lo que urge es superar la pasividad del educando frente a la exclusiva acción de transmisión de información por parte del educador, para centrarnos en una relación de habilitación del educador hacia el educando para asumir la cultura heredada y transformarla apropiándosela, al tiempo que se habilita el desarrollo de habilidades que superan la mera recepción de información hacia actitudes más comprometidas socialmente y más empáticas con la humanidad. The teaching work during the first quarter of the 21st Century renews the crisis on the act of transmitting which seems to be inherent to the task. The present essay recapitulates the historiccultural logic that has led to the aforementioned crisis after Modernity to indicate that what this crisis demands is the redefinition of all the actors who are education related. It aims to demonstrate that what urges now is to surmount passive learners faced with educators who solely transmit information in order to focus on a new form of interacting: educators who allow learners to take on an inherited culture and to transform it by appropriating it whilst permitting to develop skills that not only allow to transcend the mere receiving of information, but also lead towards attitudes more socially engaged and more empathetic with humanity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".