Effect of dietary levels of herring meal on apparent protein digestibility by juvenile haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus L.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A digestibility study was conducted to investigate the effect of incorporating different levels of herring meal into test diets on apparent protein digestibility. Herring meal was incorporated at levels of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% to 90, 80, 70, 60, and 50% of a reference diet, respectively. The reference and test diets were fed to the fish to apparent satiation three times daily on weekdays and twice daily on weekends. The fish were acclimated to the experimental diets for one week and fecal collections were made for three weeks. Feces collected in the same bottle from each tank for five days a week were used as one replication for the treatment. Protein digestibility of the reference diet was 94.8%. The increase in incorporation level of herring meal from 10-50% into the test diet had no significant effect on protein digestibility of the feed ingredient, which remained constant at an average of 93.7%
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".