Comunicación y nuevas tecnologías : Etnografía de la comunicación en el Colegio Secundario Nº5.073 de Rosario de Lerma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el mundo actual se pueden percibir cambios profundos que ocurren a alta velocidad, transformando los hábitos de la humanidad. Existen grandes avances en la productividad, transformaciones en las pautas de consumo y, consecuentemente, en las costumbres de los individuos. Uno de los principales tópicos de estos cambios es la implicancia de los avances tecnológicos y su impacto en los medios de comunicación. Dentro de esta idea es donde se inserta el trabajo de tesis que va estudiar cómo los adolescentes de Rosario de Lerma desarrollan competencias comunicativas a partir de la interacción con las Nuevas Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación (NTIC). Se supone, dentro del marco de esta investigación de grado, que el uso de las NTIC produce cambios en la dimensión comunicacional y en el terreno de las comunicaciones. Los objetivos propuestos que son estudiados en este contexto comunicacional que se presenta entre los adolescentes a partir del uso de Nuevas Tecnologías de la Comunicación están vinculados en lo metodológico y teórico, utilizando herramientas de la etnografía de la comunicación. Los instrumentos metodológicos seleccionados fueron: la observación directa, la entrevista etnográfica no estructurada y la encuesta. La observación directa se utilizó con el propósito de conocer el ámbito donde se desenvuelven los estudiantes. La entrevista etnográfica no estructurada se empleó para profundizar el trabajo de campo. La encuesta se focalizó sobre todo en el grado de usos de las NTIC y un breve bosquejo de la situación social para enriquecer la investigación. El método elegido fue el cualitativo, acorde con la etnografía de la comunicación. Cabe destacar que se desarrollaron aspectos teóricos – conceptuales tales como el desarrollo del modelo SPEAKING propuesto por Dell Hymes, etnografía de la comunicación y aspectos que se deben considerar del marco social particular de cada grupo de análisis desde la mirada de autores como Cabero (1999) y McLuhan (1964,1969) que conformaron la base epistemológica de la presente investigación. Significant changes that occur at high speed, transforming the habits of humanity, can be perceived in the current world. There exists important advances in productivity, changes in patterns of consumption and, consequently, in the customs of individuals. One of the main topics of these changes is the implication of technological advances and their impact on the media. The thesis work is inserted within this idea and will study how adolescents from Rosario de Lerma develop communicative competences from the interaction with New Information and Communication Technologies (NTICs). It is assumed that, within the framework of this graduate research, the use of NTICs produces changes in the communicative dimension and in the field of communications. The proposed objectives that are studied in this communicational context, which is presented among adolescents from the use of NTICs, are linked in the methodological and theoretical aspect, using tools of the ethnography of the communication. The selected methodological instruments were: direct observation, unstructured ethnographic interview and survey. The direct observation was used for the purpose of knowing the field where the students develop. The unstructured ethnographic interview was used to deepen the fieldwork. The survey was focused, mainly, on the degree of use of the NICTs and a brief outline about the social situation in order to enrich the research. The chosen method was the qualitative one, consistent with the ethnography of the communication. It is noteworthy that theoretical-conceptual aspects, such as the development of the SPEAKING model proposed by Dell Hymes, the ethnography of communication and aspects which are to be considered of the particular social framework of each group of analysis, were developed. The aspects were taken into account from the perspective of authors as Cabero (1999) and McLuhan (1964, 1969), who conformed the epistemological basis of the present investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".