Bibliographic record
Abstract
Múltiples factores condicionan la transmisión de una lengua en contextos bilingües, y dentro de ellos las actitudes lingüísticas juegan un rol importante. Estas son definidas como las valoraciones de los hablantes hacia un fenómeno específico, lengua, variedad o sociolecto. Este trabajo aborda el problema en Montreal, contexto multilingüe y multidialectal, donde el español comparte uso con el francés y el inglés, lenguas mayoritarias, y donde distintas variedades del español entran en contacto. El objetivo del estudio es determinar, a través del cuestionario, las actitudes de jóvenes hispanohablantes (14-24 años) frente al español y sus variedades dialectales. Los resultados muestran que: 1) los informantes reconocen la diversidad del español y se reconocen en su norma, 2) las normas de origen, la mexicanocentroamericana y el español peninsular gozan de prestigio entre los jóvenes, 3) se reconoce cierta tendencia a la acomodación lingüística en la primera generación, 4) los jóvenes se perfilan como transmisores de la lengua española y afirman valorarla positivamente, por lealtad y por la utilidad de la misma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".