MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132723697

Dianping.com: Simplifying Reservation Service Products

2015· other· W7132723697 on OpenAlexaff
S. Li, Liang Dong, Leiping Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2015
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReservationService (business)Product (mathematics)Service providerKey (lock)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2012年5月末的一天,大众点评创始人、CEO张涛与高级产品经理王旭刚及其团队刚刚结束会议,王旭刚情绪不高,团队负责的预约预订业务产品开发提案被张涛否决了。张涛认为这一提案脱离了商户的现有使用习惯,而MVP产品也设计得过于复杂,没有聚焦在核心消费者最为迫切的需求上。王旭刚有些迷惑,餐饮市场商户管理水平参差不齐,预订流程还停留在纸加笔的阶段,消费者的用户习惯却已经被移动互联网大大改变,要考虑到双方习惯,又要简洁高效,王旭刚遇到了设计产品的难题。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2410.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207