MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132727750

Canature's Sustainable Development: Explorations and Practices

2022· other· W7132727750 on OpenAlexaff
李秀娟, 鞠慧蓉

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2022
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)SustainabilityGovernment (linguistics)Field (mathematics)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例主要介绍了开能健康科技集团有限公司(简称“开能”)在面临污水排放不达标时,考虑到自身的主营业务为净水,因此不计成本投入建造全水回用系统,自2013年起实现了污水零排放,甚至“负排放”。全水回用系统的建造极大丰富了开能园区的自然环境,也为后来工业旅游项目的开设奠定了基础。开能坚持不在工业旅游项目中宣传或推广产品,而是向游客推广健康相关理念。随着时间的推移,开能也衍生出多项活动作为旅游的配套或拓展,壮大工业旅游项目。 与此同时,开能也经历了管理层与公司战略上的一系列变动。2014年,创始人瞿建国卸任董事长后,没有选择由儿子瞿亚明接班,而是引进了职业经理人。但职业经理人制定的新战略与开能并不兼容,因此于2020年终止了合作。瞿亚明也在充分观察和学习后,正式接班,重新梳理开能的发展。 2021年,开能的净水业务在海外市场节节攀升,使得开能的销售和盈利均实现飞速增长。瞿亚明在思考是否推动开能一直引以为傲的工业旅游项目进一步发展,与此同时,他也在考虑这样的投入是否值得,工业旅游项目对于整个集团来说定位应该是什么?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0170.029
Scholarly communication0.0230.015
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207