MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132733293

Fotile Group: Creating a Culture-Driven Organization

2021· other· W7132733293 on OpenAlexaff
李秀娟, 鞠慧蓉, 赵丽缦

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2021
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Government (linguistics)Work (physics)Context (archaeology)Identification (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例主要介绍了方太集团(简称“方太”)引入中华优秀传统文化并与西方管理学理论相结合,用独特的企业文化驱动成长。自1996年创立至今,方太非常重视企业文化,并在持续地学习和探索中升级企业文化。在经过四个主要发展阶段后形成了“中学明道,西学优术,中西合璧,以道御术”这套具有中国特色的文化体系。自此,方太文化有效地指导方太的运营,推动其发展。内部管理中,方太以“仁爱之心”关爱员工,推动物质和精神共成长;业务发展上,方太提倡“文化即业务”,以顾客的幸福生活作为业务的目标和发展初心。 2017年,方太销售额突破百亿元,成为厨电领域首家销售过亿的企业。随后,方太董事长兼总裁茅忠群升级了企业使命——“为了亿万家庭的幸福”,并立下了新的目标——到2030年前后成为一家千亿级的伟大企业。作为方太文化催生出的使命和目标,茅忠群相信方太文化将是方太在新时期发展的主要驱动力。 然而,尽管经过了长期地探索和不断地调整,方太文化还是存在着一些问题或争议。首先,方太是否应该将文化纳入绩效考核进一步推动文化落地?其次,作为文化落地重要体现的“身股制”过去和将来的具体作用如何?最重要的是,面向未来,方太引以为傲的文化体系将如何推动千亿级伟大企业这一目标的实现,并帮助方太走向国际?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.010
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207