MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132740990

Improving consistency in methane emission quantification from the natural gas distribution systems across measurement devices

2025· article· en· W7132740990 on OpenAlex
J. Tettenhorn, D. Zavala-Araiza, D. Stroeken, H. Maazallahi, C. van der Veen, A. Hensen, I. Velzeboer, W.C.M. van den Bulk, F. Vogel, L. Gillespie, S. Ars, J. France, D. Lowry, R. Fisher, T. Röckmann

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTNO Repository · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiteit UtrechtEnvironmental Defense FundPolitecnico di Torino
KeywordsMethaneConsistency (knowledge bases)Natural gasMetric (unit)Spatial distributionMethane gasTransectAtmospheric methaneAnalyser
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile real-time measurements of ambient methane provide a fast and effective method to identify and quantify methane leaks from local gas distribution systems in urban areas. The objectives of these methodologies are to (i) identify leak locations for repair and (ii) construct measurement-based emission rate estimates, which can im prove emissions reporting and contribute to monitoring emis sion changes over time. Currently, the most common method for emission quantification uses the maximum methane en hancement detected while crossing a methane plume. How ever, the recorded maximum depends on instrument charac teristics, such as measurement cell size, pump speed, and measurement frequency. Consequently, the current approach can only be used by instruments with similar characteristics. We suggest that the integrated spatial peak area is a more suitable quantity that can eliminate the bias between different instruments. Based on controlled release experiments con ducted with various devices in four cities (London, Toronto, Rotterdam, and Utrecht), emission estimation methodologies were evaluated. Indeed, when different analysers were mea suring in the same vehicle and from the same air inlet, the integrated spatial peak area was found to be a more robust metric across different methane gas analyser devices than the maximum methane enhancement. A statistical function based on integrated spatial peak area is proposed for more consistent emission estimations when using different instru ments. On top of this systematic relation between actual emission rate and recorded spatial peak area, large variations in methane spatial peak area were observed for the multiple transects across the same release point, in line with previ ous experiments. This variability is the main contributor to uncertainty in efforts to use mobile measurements to priori tize leak repair. We show that repeated transects can reduce this uncertainty and improve the categorization into differ ent leak categories. We recommend a minimum of three and an optimal range of five–seven plume transects for effective emission quantification to prioritize repair actions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it