MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132757097

Huawei the Ren Zhengfei Way: The "Tough Guy" and His Corporate Philosophy

2018· other· en· W7132757097 on OpenAlexaff
Jiing‐Lih Farh, Xin Pi

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganizational cultureStyle (visual arts)Leadership styleManagement stylesManagement philosophyCulture change
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case mainly describes the leadership of Ren Zhengfei, the founder of Huawei technologies co., LTD., focusing on how his leadership behavior embodies the distinctive style of "paternalistic leadership", what challenges he now faces, and how to adjust leadership style. In founding Huawei, Ren integrated his military experience into the enterprise culture and system construction, emphasizing qualities like clear goalsetting, discipline, sacrifice, and absolute obedience. At the same time, he adheres to the idea of "taking care of the troops" and rewards employees with high salaries. Under this system, Huawei has become a fierce and progressive enterprise and has developed rapidly. However, with the change of market environment and employee characteristics, this management model has began to expose more and more problems, causing a decline in both corporate performance and employee satisfaction. Huawei must conduct fundamental changes in business, culture and management systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207