MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132798513

Costco's China Business Model: To Change or Not To Change?

2021· other· W7132798513 on OpenAlexaff
张文清, 朱琼

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2021
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Order (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例描述了开市客带着其会员制仓储零售模式的核心竞争力进驻中国大陆市场前后的一系列动作,和它所面临的市场竞争态势以及所获得的市场反应。截至2020年4月,开市客在中国大陆的第一家卖场已运营了7个月,期间,它又买了两块用于开卖场的地皮。它的这种经营模式,与其全球模式,特别是北美模式几乎没有区别,然而,它在这里遇到的消费者反应却出乎意料,开业当天卖场火爆到不得不提前半天关门,但几天后它又迎来了长长的退会员卡队伍…… 在这样的市场,开市客要想长久生存下去,它的商业模式到底应该变还是不变?如果不变,那它可能就要面临如何站住脚并持续发展的问题;如果变,那就意味这它可能要颠覆自己既往成功的基石,那么,如何在自我颠覆中创新出一个能满足中国大陆消费者需求的商业模式,则是它必须要面对的挑战。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0140.012
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207