La ville, un sanctuaire pour l'agriculture? : le cadre juridique et stratégique de l'agriculture urbaine dans la Communauté métropolitaine de Québec : état des lieux et perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le premier exercice consiste à délimiter les frontières de l'agriculture urbaine au Québec et dans la CMQ (I). Ensuite il convient de procéder au recensement des acteurs impliqués et des instruments politiques et réglementaires à leur disposition (II). Les compétences des acteurs étant souvent, sinon exclusivement, reliées au territoire où elles s'exercent, il appert qu'une délimitation géographique est indispensable. Une analyse documentaire des instruments juridiques, politiques et stratégiques ayant été recensés a permis de brosser le portrait de l'encadrement à la fois stratégique et juridique de l'agriculture urbaine dans la CMQ (III). La conclusion de ce rapport visera à présenter les principales pistes de réflexion pour envisager un encadrement juridique plus adéquat de l’agriculture urbaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".