MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132851494 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18812920

Cybersecurity Challenges and Countermeasures in East African Financial Systems

2005· article· en· W7132851494 on OpenAlexaff
Sipho Mthethwa, Nontshizile Ngubeni, Thabo Mkhwanazi, Kgosiwe Motha

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditPhishingData breachPsychological interventionFinancial AuditQualitative propertyGovernment (linguistics)FinTech

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Financial systems in East Africa are increasingly interconnected through digital platforms, exposing them to cybersecurity risks such as cyber-attacks and data breaches. A mixed-methods approach combining quantitative survey data with qualitative interviews was employed, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the region's financial sector. The findings indicate that phishing attacks account for over 50% of all reported cyber incidents in East African financial systems, necessitating enhanced awareness training programmes among employees. Despite challenges, a robust cybersecurity framework can be established with targeted interventions and continuous monitoring to protect financial data integrity and prevent future breaches. Financial institutions should prioritise the implementation of multi-factor authentication (MFA) systems and conduct regular security audits to mitigate vulnerabilities effectively. Model estimation used $\hat{\theta}=argmin_{\theta}\sum_i\ell(y_i,f_\theta(x_i))+\lambda\lVert\theta\rVert_2^2$, with performance evaluated using out-of-sample error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInformation and Cyber SecurityFrench-language works237,207