MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132860486

Online Non-preemptive Resource Constrained Scheduling

2024· dissertation· W7132860486 on OpenAlexaff
Donney Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetitive analysisOnline algorithmQueueScheduling (production processes)WorkloadFlow shop schedulingJob schedulerJob queueRate-monotonic scheduling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jobs in computing environments have diverse and heterogeneous resource requirements. This thesis presents a study of online, non-preemptive scheduling algorithms for multiple identical machines. In this environment, users send their job requests to be served by these machines, using their resources to satisfy the requests. With multiple requests to serve, the machines need an inherent scheduling objective to optimize. We study the scheduling objectives of the average weighted completion time, the maximum flow time (which is defined as job completion time minus their release time), and the maximum stretch (the ratio of job flow time and its processing time). The key challenge addressed is resource allocation to jobs with non-uniform demands across multiple resource types, such as CPU, memory, and storage. Further, as the thesis studies the online arrival of jobs, their parameters are not revealed to the schedulers until their arrival time. We use the popular competitive ratio to measure the performance of these algorithms. We first propose an online algorithm, termed Multi-Resource Interval Scheduling (MRIS) that achieves a competitive ratio of 8R(1+ϵ) for the average weighted completion time, where R is the number of resource types. To the best of the authors knowledge, this is the first theoretical competitive analysis under the considered system. We further show that the well-known priority queue algorithms can have arbitrarily bad competitive ratios in this setting. In numerical experiments using production workload traces from Microsoft Azure, the proposed algorithm is shown to significantly outperform priority queue algorithms and other state-of-the-art schedulers. Due to stronger lower bounds, we leverage resource augmentation to provide competitive ratio bounds for algorithms for the maximum flow and maximum stretch. In these relaxed models, our algorithms additional resources compared to the optimal algorithms. Using 10R speed augmentation, we provide an algorithm that obtains no greater maximum flow time than the optimal scheduler. We use the previous algorithm as a subroutine to present an approach that achieves a maximum stretch no greater than the optimal scheduler. These algorithms are enabled by interval scheduling paradigms, where the algorithm exercises patience to wait for additional knowledge of job arrivals before committing to scheduling decisions. Although this simple idea is not novel, we use it to obtain competitive ratios for the algorithms presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207