MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132861663

Impact of ZnT8 Deficiency on Insulin Synthesis and Secretion in a Beta-Cell Specific Knockout Model

2023· dissertation· W7132861663 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Piro

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulinInsulin oscillationSecretionBeta cellDiabetes mellitusBasal (medicine)Knockout mouseReceptorAntagonist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) is abundantly expressed in beta cells, located on insulin secretory granule membranes. ZnT8 manages high zinc concentrations which contribute to insulin synthesis, crystallization, and secretion pathways, however, impacts of altered ZnT8 activity and accompanying changes to zinc concentrations remains poorly understood. To gain insight into ZnT8 function, ZnT8 beta cell specific knockout (ZnT8 BKO) mice were assessed, which showed elevated insulin secretion capacity when treated with the insulin receptor antagonist S961, which translated ex vivo to increased KCl and glucose stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) of isolated ZnT8 BKO islets. Interestingly, basal mitochondrial function was elevated, and beta cell-to-beta cell synchrony of calcium influx was reduced, but neither were attributed to elevated insulin secretion. Instead, ZnT8 BKO islets did show a reduction to their elevated GSIS when exposed to added zinc, suggesting enhanced secretion may result from removal of negative feedback of zinc on beta cell secretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→