MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132863439

Efficient Aircraft Flutter Analysis using Model Order Reduction with Error Estimation

2022· dissertation· W7132863439 on OpenAlexaff
Brandon Michael Lowe

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAeroelasticityFlutterAerodynamicsControl theory (sociology)EstimatorReduction (mathematics)Approximation error
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fast and accurate aircraft flutter analysis in the transonic regime remains an open problem due to the high computational cost of accurately modelling transient aerodynamic forces. In this thesis, a methodology for flutter prediction with the application of model order reduction with error estimation is presented to reduce computational cost while achieving user desired accuracy. The methodology is shown to be computationally efficient, minimize the requirement for user knowledge, and provide user-prescribed accuracy for flutter prediction relative to the high-dimensional aeroelastic model. The Euler equations are used to model the aerodynamics, which are linearized about a nonlinear steady-state solution and reduced using a projection-based model order reduction approach. The resulting aerodynamic ROM is coupled to a structural model to form the primal aeroelastic ROM. The aeroelastic ROM is of low order, allowing for a computationally efficient parameter sweep of the aeroelastic eigenproblem to determine the flutter point. A dual-weighted residual-based error estimator is presented which approximates the error in the eigenvalues obtained from the primal aeroelastic ROM relative to the true eigenvalues from the high-dimensional aeroelastic model. This error estimator makes use of a dual aeroelastic ROM to approximate the dual solution. A second error estimator is presented which approximates the error in the predicted flutter point relative to the true flutter point from the high-dimensional model. By combining the aforementioned algorithmic elements, a ROM-based flutter methodology with error estimation is developed. The proposed method provides the user with approximate aeroelastic eigenvalues, an approximate flutter point, and an estimate of the error in both these quantities. Flutter analyses are presented for several test cases. Both the eigenvalue and flutter point error estimators are shown to have good agreement with the true error. For the test cases presented, the cost of computing the flutter point at a given Mach number is equivalent to the cost of approximately 4 to 15 steady nonlinear flow evaluations of the high-dimensional Euler equations. When compared to a POD-based ROM approach, the proposed method achieves comparable or faster computational times for similar levels of error while additionally providing error estimates for flutter analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207