MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132864001

Assessment of the Integrity of Fish Communities In The Great Lakes Area: A Bayesian Perspective

2021· dissertation· W7132864001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ariola Visha

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Resources and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicFish <Actinopterygii>Bayesian probabilityState of the EnvironmentPerspective (graphical)Bayesian inferenceFish stockBayesian networkBaseline (sea)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Lakes are a well recognized national ecological feature and are a prized natural resource. As a basin as well as individual water bodies, the Great Lakes have undergone significant environmental changes. Fish communities have been impacted significantly by these environmental changes. As a result, the main aim of this thesis is to assess the overall state and integrity of fish communities across the Canadian portion of the Great Lakes. This was done by applying novel Bayesian modeling techniques to evaluate the spatio-temporal trends of mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), well-known global legacy contaminants, in several fish species across all of the Canadian Great Lakes. Another goal was to identify contamination “hot spots” and create consumption advisories across all four major water bodies. Furthermore, this study assesses the rate of tumour occurrence in areas of concern (AOCs) and proposes a cohesive framework to determine tumour rates across these heavily polluted regions. Lastly, this study makes use of the Hamilton Harbour as a case study to propose and implement a probabilistic framework which aims to determine the state of a system based on current data and knowledge that could be used towards environmental policy and management decisions. The main achievement of this research is to provide a very thorough interdisciplinary analysis of the aquatic environment of the Great Lakes, by evaluating the ecosystem’s history, chemistry and biology. The Bayesian methodology applied in this research accounts for environmental uncertainty. Rather than using uncertainty as an excuse to not give answers, the models implemented make use of uncertainty to formulate risks in an informative way that can be used in a management practice (fish contamination, fish tumours, eutrophication etc). The Great Lakes are interconnected to one another, while also being distinct ecosystem regions and although their current state and the state of the fish communities has improved significantly over the past forty years, further research and monitoring should be implemented to adapt and match changing future scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicWater Resources and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207