MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132864242

Subwavelength Dispersion Engineering for Nonlinear Integrated Photonics

2024· dissertation· W7132864242 on OpenAlexaff
Amesh Hazoor Kahloon

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGratingPhotonicsSilicon photonicsWaveguideSiliconDispersion (optics)Nonlinear systemCMOSCoupling (piping)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The significant index contrast between silicon and other CMOS compatible materials provides substantial obstruction and difficulty in obtaining phase-matching conditions to compensate for the high nonlinear losses in silicon materials. This thesis demonstrates exploiting subwavelength grating structures to perform dispersion engineering on an integrated photonic platform to obtain phase-matching conditions between different material platforms to obtain third-order nonlinear optical processes to obtain frequency generation through Kerr combs. Different material platforms were implemented to obtain various phase-matching conditions with the final architecture based on an aluminum oxide bus waveguide coupled to a silicon nitride subwavelength grating structure to induce Kerr comb generation on robust integrated photonic architectures. These contrasting material platforms were successfully designed in order to eliminate the detrimental two-photon absorption, thereby reducing nonlinear losses. The final architecture consisted of the required phase-matchingconditions and coupling length for complete power transfer between the fundamental TE mode from the aluminum oxide bus waveguide to the second order TE mode in the silicon nitride SWG ring resonator, which obtained a high-quality factor of 126900 to obtain a high-Q integrated photonic devices using numerical 2D and 3D solver which are compatible with CMOS fabrication to obtain bright soliton Kerr combs that were simulated using the Lugiato-Lefever equation while eliminate the occurrence of nonlinear losses in the TPA effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207