MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132864784

Addressing the Heterogeneity of Smooth Muscle Tumours by Bulk RNAseq Multilevel Clustering

2025· dissertation· W7132864784 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Megan Frances Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsSmooth muscleCluster analysisCluster (spacecraft)LeiomyosarcomaGenePI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwaySmooth Muscle TumorHierarchical clustering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm with smooth muscle differentiation, presenting in abdominal, extremity, and uterine sites. As a primary site, uterine LMS (uLMS) management can be complicated, as benign uterine leiomyomas (uLM) can share indistinguishable similarities pre-operatively to uLMS. This work aims to investigate the heterogeneity of uterine smooth muscle tumours (USMTs) and all sites of LMS using an unsupervised bulk RNAseq transcriptional clustering pipeline, RACCOON. A spectrum across uLM, STUMP, and uLMS was identified, with the presence of a uLM/STUMP/uLMS cluster distinct from the independent uLMS cluster. Furthermore, 3 subtypes of LMS emerged: LMS A, LMS B, and uLMS, of which LMS B showed significantly prolonged metastatic-free survival and enrichment in mTOR and metabolic gene sets. Taken together, exploration of transcriptional relationships across smooth muscle tumours allows for cluster stratification, which may show benefit to tailored management plans, and offer insight into their biological mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207