MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132869902

Distributed Optimization Algorithms with Improved Efficiency, Reliability, and Privacy Preservation

2025· dissertation· W7132869902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRIKENVector InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsDifferential privacyRandomnessComputationDistributed learningDistributed algorithmSecure multi-party computationPopularityCryptographyInformation privacy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With machine learning growing in popularity and relying more on big data and large-scale computations, the demand for distributed computing has continuously increased. This thesis is motivated by the challenges that have emerged as a result of this demand. The first challenge is the spread of computations across multiple processing nodes with varying and unpredictable speeds, leading to per-node delays, known as "straggler" issues. The second challenge is the result of data contribution from sources with diverse privacy requirements, making the development of equitable privacy-preserving approaches for data usage more complex. Motivated by these challenges, the following three research themes form the main contributions of this thesis. In the first research theme, we incorporate approximation techniques to develop a more efficient coded distributed computing (CDC) approach for mitigating straggler issues. CDC relies on error correction codes to introduce "coded" redundant tasks that are not pure replicas of the original ones. Progress in CDC has mainly focused on the realization of exact computation recovery once a sufficient number of nodes complete their tasks. However, many computational problems involve randomness and are, therefore, naturally tolerant of inexact results. In the thesis, we develop rate-distortion analogs for CDC and design "approximated" CDC schemes in which there are multiple stages of inexact recovery en route to exact recovery. As we will see in the thesis, our schemes help accelerate computation recovery by balancing between accuracy and speed. In the second and third themes, we incorporate privacy guarantees via differential privacy (DP) to develop new distributed learning methods that are tailored to the varying privacy requirements of participating nodes. Differentially-private federated learning (DP-FL) is an emerging distributed learning framework that enables nodes to collaboratively train a shared model while anonymizing their local data. Progress on DP-FL has mainly relied on implicit assumptions that nodes share the same level of trust with all other participants, have equal privacy constraints, and have fixed incentives to collaborate over time (learning iterations). In the second theme, we extend DP-FL to reflect a setting with multiple, potentially overlapping groups of nodes with varying intra- vs. inter-group levels of trust and analyze how we can control privacy leakage propagation across groups. In the third theme, we show that time variation of the standard DP-FL parameters can improve utility while adhering to personalized privacy constraints. In the thesis, we show our contributions to these two themes, which help incentivize greater participation and enhance participant equity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it