MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132871800

Identifying Synergistic Drug Combinations in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

2020· dissertation· W7132871800 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sharon Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2020
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphomaLenalidomideDrugDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaInterferonGerminal centerTofacitinibCell cultureDrug resistance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequently occurring type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, further classified by cell-of origin. Specifically, the germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype of DLBCL has shown common occurrence of EZH2 mutations. The EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat has been tested in clinical trials, but response rates are suboptimal in DLBCL. In this study, we followed up on a screen that identified IKZF1 as one of the top hits in sensitizing a relatively resistant cell line to tazemetostat, by studying the effects of lenalidomide (a drug promoting IKZF1 degradation) in combination with tazemetostat. Here, we observed synergistic drug interaction across cell lines, with enrichment of signaling pathways involved in the interferon and antiviral response in addition to significant induction of selected interferon responsive genes and dsRNA ERV expression. Altogether, our results strongly suggest that the combined targeting of IKZF1 and EZH2 has therapeutic potential in treating DLBCL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207