MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132873026

Establishing a superior tetracycline-inducible gene expression system for mouse CD200, a potential therapeutic immunosuppressive molecule

2007· dissertation· W7132873026 on OpenAlexafffund
Yang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2007
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsOntario Medical AssociationLibrary and Archives Canada
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsTransgeneGenetically modified mouseImmune systemFunction (biology)In vivoIn vitroHaematopoiesisMembrane glycoproteinsReceptor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD200 (originally called OX2) is a membrane glycoprotein expressed by a variety of cell types, including lymphocytes, neurons and endothelium. It is the ligand for CD200 receptors (CD200Rs) whose expression is limited to hematopoietic cells, especially myeloid cells. A number of in vivo studies have implied that the interaction of CD200 with CD200R1 may inhibit a variety of immune responses, including graft rejection, autoimmune disease, fetal loss syndrome, and cancer. To study further the biological function of CD200 and the CD200Rs, our lab produced TRE-CD200-EGFP transgenic mice using a Tet-On inducible system. This thesis evaluated the inducible function of rtTA2s-M2, a new generation of Tet-On regulator, and compared it to the old version of rtTA in vitro and in vivo. The data suggest that induction of the CD200-EGFP transgene in rtTA2s-M2 transgenic mice is superior to that achieved in rtTA transgenic mice following doxycycline feeding in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→