MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132874437

Methane Fluxes from Living and Dead Trees in a Temperate Forest

2022· dissertation· W7132874437 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicScience and Climate Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethaneSink (geography)Coarse woody debrisFlux (metallurgy)Atmospheric methaneTemperate climateTemperate forestDead woodSnag
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trees have been identified as an important source of methane in forest ecosystems, but little research exists on fluxes beyond their stems, such as those from foliage, branches, wounds, and coarse woody debris. Recent instrumentation advances allow rapid and accurate measurements of relatively low methane flux rates in-situ; this thesis takes advantage of such technology to explore methane fluxes from these tree components in northern hardwood forests of central Ontario, Canada. Foliage was found to represent a substantial component of forest methane budgets, acting as a sink in upland forests and a source in lowland forests (averages = -0.54, 6.06 nmol m-2 s-1; n = 27, 12, respectively). Uptake is hypothesized to occur through methanotrophs within foliage, and emissions from channelling of methane that originates in soil. In an upland site tree branches, wounds, and stems emitted methane (averages = 0.61, 10.58, 0.59 nmol m-2 s-1; n = 18, 83, 79, respectively), and at the stand scale represented 83%, 8%, and 9% of emissions from trees respectively. Emissions are hypothesized to occur through anoxic decomposition within the tree, which often occurs due to wounding. Coarse woody debris was found to act as a methane source in early decay classes and a sink in later decay classes (average flux rates ranged from 0.78 to -1.58 nmol m-2 s-1; n = 94). Immediately after harvest there was a large pulse of emissions from the cut surfaces of trees (>4000 nmol m-2 s-1 for Acer saccharum boles), but on average coarse woody debris was a methane sink in both managed and unmanaged stands. These results represent some of the first and most comprehensive in-situ methane flux measurements from tree branches, wounds, foliage, and coarse woody debris, and help to improve estimates of forest methane budgets. Inclusion of wounds and branches into calculations of tree methane fluxes will increase net emissions, but inclusion of upland foliage and dead wood as methane sinks can offset them. Strengthening forest methane sinks and reducing sources is an attractive policy option for “climate-smart” forestry, and this research can be built upon to support future efforts in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it