MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132878815

Reconceptualizing development from women's standpoint in colonial relations

2003· dissertation· W7132878815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia Eileen Albani Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInquestEthnographyInterviewColonialismPoliticsWork (physics)Event (particle physics)Participant observation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims at reconceptualizing "Development" through investigation of local forms of social organization that articulate the work of women in Canada to the Development regime. The study exposes how historically-anchored social relations operated through the twentieth century to variously organize the lives of women, reappropriate their caring labour and reproduce distortions of difference among them. The investigation that formed the basis of this inquiry took as its starting point the "standpoint of women" as elaborated by sociologist and feminist thinker Dorothy E. Smith. Thirty-seven people who experienced the death of a family member on Lake Simcoe in the vicinity of the Town of Georgina between 1950 and 1999 were interviewed. Sixteen women, all of whom had each experienced the death of their male partner on the lake, were selected for indepth interviews. These interviews explored the grieving, self-care and life-reordering work each woman was required to do and did in the wake of her partner's death, and how the event of the death operated to articulate her work to larger social, economic, and political processes comprising the ruling apparatus. The interviews brought into focus similarities and differences in women's experiences, and illuminated the relationship of local peoples' colonial and imperial past to their globalized and globalizing present. Information gathered through interviewing guided subsequent investigation into institutional processes that shaped local experiences. The investigator used institutional ethnography as the mode of inquiry into a series of institutional work sites: (1) the Trent-Severn Waterway and the Indian Claims Commission; (2) the coroner's inquest into the drowning deaths of five Royal Canadian Mounted Policemen and the print media; (3) Hospice Georgina/Chippewa of Georgina Island volunteer caregiving services and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Social Services health care reform; (4) Transit Georgina and the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Community Transportation Action Program. In addition to interviews, methods of investigation included historical archival research and analysis of organizational documents and other contemporaneous textual forms and knowledge practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.084
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.012
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→