MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132879044

Merchants missionaries: Patenting life, competing international obligations and the proselytization of a Realistic Utopia

2007· dissertation· W7132879044 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bita Amani

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2007
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman rightsSanctionsContext (archaeology)LegislationInternational trade lawArgument (complex analysis)State (computer science)Free tradeAgency (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian patent legislation was recently amended to reflect a commitment in trade instruments to public health by providing developing countries access to essential medicines. Canada failed to take this opportunity to respond to the patent-human rights debate manifested in the patenting of life. Universal minimum standards for patent protection are now required of all WTO Members. This thesis considers how seemingly discordant rules under the trade and human rights regimes can be reconciled domestically and internationally in order to maximize regulatory and cultural diversity while minimizing state liability to citizens, patentees, and foreign states. A principled blend of historical, doctrinal, and interpretative textual analyses support the argument that states should not be discouraged by the threat of trade sanctions in giving human rights obligations priority over trade in domestic law and policy. A bi-furcated framework for appropriate state agency is provided. Patents have been extended to life and its building blocks by judicial fiat and administrative inertia rather than deliberate democratic parliamentary processes involving public participation. Two Supreme Court of Canada decisions obfuscate rather than clarify legal issues. A comparative examination of the Canadian context results in the first branch of the prescribed framework wherein domestic regulatory responses enabling governments to prioritize human rights consistent preferences for health over industrial policy are outlined. An anticipated international approach is necessary to complement national strategies in case of a resulting trade dispute and constitutes the second branch. The recognition of an equitable conduct defence (ECD) by WTO decision-making bodies is a necessary legal mechanism to protect a state's right to self-determination. This defence enables states to meet their human rights obligations and fulfill duties owed to citizens while removing any real or perceived international impediments to state action in the patenting life debate. Modernity has made all measures trade-related; the future existence and legitimacy of the WTO requires the organization to act as steward of broader social values that are consistent with its own institutional history and instruments but also with political ideals of a Realistic Utopia. The Millennium Development Goals demand no less from our merchants and missionaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.065
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207