MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132880538

Adaptive Optics: Control and Calibration

2025· dissertation· W7132880538 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jacob Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCalibrationPython (programming language)SoftwareScalabilityController (irrigation)Adaptive controlActuatorAdaptive optics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates control and calibration methodologies for astronomical Adaptive Optics (AO) systems, focusing on three primary contributions: the development of an open-source real-time control software, enhancements in next-generation AO systems, and improvements to control strategies through machine learning. The goal of this research is to increase the accessibility, performance, and efficiency of AO systems by introducing new control architectures, scalable real-time solutions, and advanced calibration methods. The first contribution is pyRTC, an open-source software designed for kHz-speed real-time control in high actuator count AO systems. By leveraging Python for its high-level programmability, pyRTC demonstrates that real-time control tasks, traditionally confined to low-level environments, can be effectively managed within a flexible, high-level programming framework. Key features include multi-processing to bypass Python’s GIL, just-in-time compilation, GPU acceleration, and shared memory-based data transfer pipelines. pyRTC also integrates with PyTorch, allowing the streamlined testing of AI-based controllers in real-time. The second contribution focuses on the MMTO Adaptive exoPlanet characterization System (MAPS), in particular, the commissioning of a NIR PyWFS camera and the ESCAPE calibration protocol. ESCAPE, a hybrid approach combining empirical and pseudo-synthetic techniques, addresses calibration challenges unique to convex adaptive secondary mirrors, where internal light sources are inaccessible. Laboratory results confirm the effectiveness of ESCAPE for interaction matrix generation, while initial on-sky tests reveal limitations related to pupil illumination and hardware imperfections, which continue to be investigated. The final contribution explores AI-enhanced controllers, implemented on the RAZOR test bench, using a convolutional LSTM-based predictive controller. Initial results indicate that the controller significantly improves performance under high temporal error conditions. pyRTC facilitates real-time integration of these AI-based control methods, demonstrating the feasibility of implementing machine learning techniques in AO control systems. This thesis aligns with the projected needs of next-generation observatories as outlined in the Astro 2020 decadal survey, which anticipates an increased demand for AO instrumentation and a growing AO workforce. The findings contribute to the development of scalable, accessible AO solutions, aiming to support future observatories and foster advancements in astronomical AO research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207