MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132880961

The influence of social capital on drug use-related health behaviours: A study of marginalized drug users

2007· dissertation· W7132880961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maritt J Kirst

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2007
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial network (sociolinguistics)DrugSocial capitalSample (material)Social network analysisDrug userSocial determinants of health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marginalized drug users such as injection drug users and crack smokers are at risk for several health problems, including blood-borne disease infections such as HIV, Hepatitis B and C, and overdose. Behaviours that contribute to health risk stem not only from an individual's knowledge and beliefs, but are also shaped by processes of influence and constraint operating within networks of social relationships. The analysis of users' social network relationships is therefore important to understand users' engagement in drug use-related risk and protective behaviours. This study examined the influence of social network relationships on the drug use-related health behaviours of a convenience sample of 80 drug users (40 injection drug users and 40 crack smokers) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. In the study, social network relationships were conceptualized as social capital. A comprehensive approach to social capital was incorporated which examined access to and use of social capital, as well as the influence of two dimensions of social capital, network structure and network resources, on a variety of drug use-related risk and protective health behaviours. Furthermore, differences between injection drug users (IDUs) and crack smokers (CSs) were examined to determine if these groups have differential health service needs. Quantitative and qualitative research methods were utilized in the study to explore these relationships. The study identified interesting relationships between various forms of social capital and different drug use-related health behaviours. The study showed that particular types of resources embedded in participants' drug use networks had a positive effect on engagement in protective health behaviours, while certain aspects of network structure within the drug network had a positive effect on engagement in health risk behaviours. Findings showed that resources embedded in the non-drug use network had a negative effect on engagement in protective health behaviours. The study also detected significant differences between IDUs and CSs with respect to levels of social capital and effect on drug use-related health behaviours. Several individual- and structural-level factors were also found to be associated with engagement in drug use-related health behaviours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk→French-language works237,207→