Bibliographic record
Abstract
'CORONA', a single-movement work for medium-sized orchestra like its namesake, the surface of the sun, renews and re-invigorates itself through the upsurge of new material. The organic growth of foreground thematic material through developmental procedures, although present, is not the primary underpinning of the musical unfolding. Of greater importance to the musical argument is the ongoing process of the narrative constantly moving forward and articulating large-scale symphonic form through the outburst of new material, the process of unfolding providing coherence. There are three primary sections in the piece, marked fast-slow-fast which, on the surface, appear to embody an A B A' structure; however, the proportions of the sections do not reflect the prototypical form, in which the two A sections are generally of the same length. The dimensions of the three major formal divisions can be reduced to a ratio of roughly 1:2:3, corresponding to the quantity of chronological time, and to the number of measures in each section. Major areas in the piece are informed by a sense of harmonic and thematic stability, where the work obstinately insists on musical matter only to discard it in favour of a new and contrasting one. It is in these stable sections that the inverse relationship between foreground and background becomes apparent, as the foreground slows its rate of change and fixates on its thematic content, the background structure telescopes outwards, expanding in time. In between these ephemeral moments of stability lie sudden shifts between combinations of diatonic, hexatonic, octatonic, and chromatic collections. These shifts create a heightened sense of immediacy, of the piece constantly erupting and exploding forward as the music replenishes itself creating dramatic musical contrasts through the abandonment of previous material, while the prolongation of sections through thematic fixation alters the proportions of the overall form, creating a unique structure quite unlike an A B A' form.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.294 | 0.099 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".