MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132886409

The Reliability and Error Mitigation of the Storage Stack

2023· dissertation· W7132886409 on OpenAlexaff
Andy Anheng Hwang

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Process (computing)File systemComputer data storageData centerStack (abstract data type)State (computer science)Electric power systemFault (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reliability of storage systems is critical for our modern world. As the world's demand for data expands, an ever increasing number of systems and devices are required to store and process these data. A single data center often contains hundreds of thousands and even millions of nodes. The numerous components dictate that failures within these clusters are no longer the exception but the norm, and simplistic assumptions about error characteristics and mitigation are insufficient at these scales. The cost of operation for individual systems as well as massive data centers are contingent on low rate of error incidences and successful, timely mitigation to minimize the impact to regular operations. To that end, this thesis studies the reliability of different components across the storage stack and develops mitigation strategies based on insight gained from large-scale, real-world data. Specifically, we study main memory and disks, two of the most frequently replaced components in data centers. We analyse memory error characteristics from several large-scale systems and recommend simple page retirement policies to mitigate errors. We further develop a novel technique to protect previously unprotected pages that belong to the kernel, by repurposing virtualization hardware already available on modern processors. We also evaluate several new error mitigation mechanisms available on modern hardware. At the same time, we examine the effect that temperature has on system performance and power draw. Lastly, we study the reliability of file systems on solid state drives by injecting errors based on realistic SSD fault modes. We discover bugs that are present in popular file systems and make recommendations on future file system design. Overall, we advance the understanding of error characteristics and mitigation in several aspects and across different layers of the storage stack. We study errors by observing systems in deployment, and use the insights gained to develop effective mitigation that target real-world scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207