MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132886719

Freedom of expression and copyright law in Canada and Australia: unchartered territory?

2003· dissertation· W7132886719 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katya Rozenblit

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCopyright and Intellectual Property
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance (ability)Copyright lawArgument (complex analysis)Freedom of expressionPublic domainExpression (computer science)Private lawPublic interestPublic rights
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the extent to which Copyright Law strikes a balance between private rights of ownership and freedom of expression. My approach draws upon examples from Canada and Australia, jurisdictions in which the region between copyright and freedom of expression is relatively uncharted territory. Part I briefly examines the underlying rationales of both freedom of expression and copyright. Part II analyses the efficacy of mechanisms within copyright law designed to facilitate a balance between private ownership and free expression. Part III examines factors external to copyright law itself, affecting the balance between private and public rights, and therefore affecting freedom of expression. Part IV concludes the argument and contemplates divergent alternatives for redressing copyright law and whether in practice such changes would affect the existing balance between private rights of authorship and public rights to access and use of information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0180.037
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicCopyright and Intellectual PropertyFrench-language works237,207