MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132886742

Development of Smart Textile Systems for Electrophysiological Monitoring

2022· dissertation· W7132886742 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Milad Alizadeh-Meghrazi

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsLaminationTextileElectrodeElectrophysiologyData acquisitionWaveformSIGNAL (programming language)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide. Assessments of cardiac electrical signals, such as variations in cardiac rhythm or abnormalities in wave form, allow for diagnoses of cardiac disease states. Conventionally, the cardiac electrical signals are acquired using gel electrodes, part of electrocardiogram (ECG) assessment. Gel electrodes have limitations for long-term use due to durability issues and possible skin irritations. This presents a need for an alternative to gel electrodes that addresses the limitations for long-term ECG measurements such as a holter system, while providing comparable clinical applicability and accuracy.Throughout human history, textiles have been a ubiquitous technology. Their pervasive nature makes them a promising medium as a replacement for gel electrodes. This can be achieved through the introduction of materials that can capture electrical signals from the body. These materials can be introduced through techniques of lamination on textiles or as a fiber/yarn in the textile production process. In this thesis a variety of materials from the literature were selected and deployed using textile lamination and knitting, to create textile-based electrodes for electrophysiological signal acquisition. The textile-based electrodes were electrically characterized and compared to gel electrodes. The textile electrodes were further classified for their performance in the acquisition of electrophysiological signals, such as electrocardiogram (ECG) and electromyogram (EMG). In the subsequent phase of this thesis textile form factors were designed and developed, that incorporated the textile-based electrodes best suited for ECG and EMG acquisition. The form factors were selected for use cases in, a) ECG: continuous monitoring through an underwear form factor for CVD, and b) EMG: continuous monitoring through a sleeve form factor for prosthetic control. Successful demonstrations are presented of the developed textile form factors, and the custom algorithms needed for the analysis of acquired electrophysiological signals from the textile-based electrodes. In conclusion, a framework for the design, development, testing and validation of textile based electrophysiological systems is presented. These guidelines and best practices should pave the way for future developments in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207