MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132890885

Modeling biodegradation of halogenated acetic acids in drinking water treatment

2003· dissertation· W7132890885 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Walt Bayless

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHaloacetic acidsBiodegradationWater treatmentTrichloroacetic acidAcetic acidMicroorganismDegradation (telecommunications)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Halogenated acetic acids formed during the disinfection of drinking water have been found to be degradable during biological filtration and in distribution systems. Previous studies have shown varying results concerning the ability of microorganisms to degrade individual disinfection by-products (DBPs). Knowledge of the biological removal of these compounds is necessary to ensure the accuracy of empirical models in predicting concentrations of biodegradable disinfection by-products, such as haloacetic acids. This study examined the ability of a microbial innoculum collected from a water treatment plant to degrade six haloacetic acids. All but trichloroacetic acid could be degraded when exposed to a biofilm. The order of degradability under this study was found to be monobromo- > monochloro- > bromochloro- > dichloro- > dibromo- > trichloro-acetic acid. Simple one-dimensional mathematical biofilm models were applied to experimental data in order to estimate Monod kinetic constants for the biological degradation of haloacetic acids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207